Why are there so many Indian students in America?

How come there are so many students in India in the United States? It's a pleasure to be able to help you. Let's talk about it now. America’s Silicon Valley is “occupying” by Indians? More than a billion people are illiterate, how can India create high-level talent? A strange thing has recently come to mind: the US has a technology like Microsoft, Google, IBM, which is among the highest in many fields of monopoly, but most of these American giants are actually dominated by Indians: Microsoft Ceonadra is of Indian origin; Google CEO Sandar-Pichai is of Indian origin; and IBM’s CEO is now being taken over by an Indian citizen, Alkwin Krishna.

The US Silicon Valley, the world’s technology center, is now being occupied by Indians. According to statistics, Indian high-level technologists in Silicon Valley, America, account for one-third of the people in Silicon Valley, and are rising from year to year. To look closely, it does not seem contradictory, because India, in addition to being the most illiterate country, is also the country with the largest gap between rich and poor in the world. Coincidingly, India accounts for one-third of the world’s 1.2 billion poor, with more than 70 million people living on less than nine a day.

Access to education is all the more ridiculous when it comes to the existence of a six-member home for all of India’s people. In contrast to the rich in India, the illiteracy rate is zero, the bottom of which is a university history, and Indian families with a slightly better middle economy generally have access to higher education.

There may be friends who would say that India will not be able to afford more than eight years of compulsory education, but in fact, India’s call for more than 50 years of compulsory education has not been truly universal until today, for a simple reason: India’s birthright self-confidence, how long has it taken for us to enact the Compulsory Education Act in 1986 to truly achieve nine years of compulsory education? Fifteen years, India’s Tigers, directly enshrining the ambitious goal of universal compulsory education in the Constitution.

In India’s first five-year plan, 56% of all education is allocated to primary education. But in the practical implementation of primary education, India has continued its excellent tradition of “monstering is my only action.” As of 2007, India’s primary-school dropout rate stood at 8 out of zero, 11 out of more than 50%, and even 70% in Assam and Bihar, with India estimated that it would be 10 more years to be literate, in line with the exceptional standard of the highest acceptance rate of 3% per year. Perhaps Nehru was talking about physical elimination.

Instead of believing in the Western notion of “primary education and higher education” at the time, Nehru believed that the West was delaying the rise of my “Great Indian Empire” and that, while developing primary education, India had allocated all of its remaining education funds to higher education. I had no oil, two bets, and a direct bicycle to a train.

From the beginning of the second five-year plan, the share of funding for primary education fell to 33 per cent, reaching even 24 per cent from 1966 to 1969, while the share of funding for higher education increased to 49 per cent throughout the same period. Why don't I go straight to higher education, because primary education, though a direct solution to illiteracy, is a bottomless hole in India, where the money is broken and the money is raised, and then I have to continue with secondary education? Why didn't I go straight to higher education? I, the Great Indian Empire, was set up in 2000 to become a flog in the developed world by 2020, and there's no time for you peas to grow up?

India now has nearly 20,000 institutions of higher learning, and 18 of its priority colleges, represented by the Indian Institute of Technology, are fratricidal of absolute spending on education, while most of the remaining programmes are largely on the verge of collapse every day. The source is also related to its “sunset father” (United Kingdom).

Indian universities in recent times appeared during British colonial rule in the 19th century, when Britain found, after enslaving India for most of its life, that it was industrial times, and that Indian intelligence and intelligence were still so low? Thus, in 1813, the British Parliament authorized East Indian companies to manage the educational affairs of the colonies, and Count Markawley drew up the famous Macauly Memorandum, which stressed: “In view of the fact that the government does not have sufficient funds to carry out popular education on the mainland, the colonial government should establish higher education institutions that can only be targeted at a few elites.” So the Indian colonial government raised elite education with little money.

After having been educated, India’s elite finally realized that they were originally Indians, began a non-violent, non-cooperative campaign under Gandhi’s leadership of “silent as water,” and demanded that Britain divide the power of education a little bit. At the end of the First World War, Britain had won, but at the expense of the economy, not to worry about India.

As a result, the colonial government has made concessions in the educational management system, with a “diversion” of power, with the central retention of some powers, the rest being transferred to the states, jointly administered by the central and local authorities, and found no, after which India was left behind in primary education. In the first few years, local initiatives were high, but remember that there was no consensus between the states in bulk, and that the development of education was arbitrary, with India’s literacy rate as low as 8.6% as of 1931.

On August 15th, 1947, when India became independent, the new bulk country had no money, but no more suffering for its children. The first thing Nehru thought of was universal primary education and reform of higher education was that it was a nymph, that nymphos' “achievement” we had just said, and that nymphoma had to be obscured.

So, in the 1950’s and 1960’s, the number of Indian higher education institutions expanded rapidly from 606 in 1950 to 2370 in 1965, with the opening up of private universities in the 1980’s, and the number of Indian universities has so far risen by 8410, not to mention the fact that India’s colleges have adopted the so-called nazi system, which now stands at more than 30,000 and has gone to 40,000. But poverty, often accompanied by me, has led to the construction of more universities, with central higher education spending, even though it has risen.

From the early 1950’s to the early 1970’s, higher education in India rose from one-fourth to one-third of total education spending, let alone the recession in India in the early 1970’s, the investment in higher education in India, and the development of a higher education system. With limited funding, India certainly has to spend its money on what they see as a knife, which is, yes, engineering technology, commerce, science, which is directly linked to GDP, and the country has two systems based on the level of education in these popular professions: the national priority colleges system and the general higher education system.

Key colleges are delicious, and ordinary high schools die every day. In the 18 schools’ priority college system, one of the schools is funded by 15% of the priority allocation, namely, Indian Polytechnic, the only designated seminary in India’s eyes, and the vast majority of the people who make up one-third of Silicon Valley’s talent in the first place comes from this school.

In India, there's always been a god who blew Indian technology: one day, the professor of MIT asked the Indian student in his class if you had Indian technology in India, why did you come here? This is how the student came back: I came to MIT because I couldn't qualify for MIT! The mad professor almost had a heart attack on the spot.

Is Indian polytechnics really like India’s first in the world? To be honest, Indian polytechnics were not very high in the world, and between 2019 and 2020, its best Mumbai school was only 162nd, and even in Asia, 33rd, so where did Indian self-confidence come from? India’s Polytechnic Institute was founded in 1951, and in 1956, the Indian Congress passed the Polytechnic Act, avoiding bureaucratic interference with the Polytechnic Institute, where curricula and admissions became school-owned decisions, so that the Indian Polytechnics, which have made the changes in the spring, have gone so far as to become the national polytechnics’ handlers. Similarly, Indian polytechnics are naturally high in terms of the difficulty of the curriculum, especially mathematics.

But if an Indian student wants to take this school, it's not a question of whether or not, but of whether he or she is worthy of it. Please try to follow my brain hole: assuming that we were born in a very unfortunate Indian family, it is fortunate that our family still has some food to support you in your studies, and we will have to decide the way ahead from the tenth grade (which is our senior year).

At the same time, just like you, there are more than 10 million people who have to make decisions, and there are not many choices, and the four most dominant are science, medicine, business, and literature. You're probably a science student, because, under a state of brainwashing, ordinary Indian parents always think that they are less proficient, less proficient, less proficient and less able to save India.

And there's only one thing that SIT can do, and why? Because when it's finished, it's better than Mo's driver, and one of India's Pubén graduates has a salary similar to that of India's Mo's driver, which is about 1,500 yuan a month, and the average salary of India's S.T.I. graduates is 20 times that, so what are you going to do?

And after you were forced to choose Indian polytechnics, congratulations were given to you, and you no longer had so-called personal space, because when you wrote the words Indian polytechnic, you were faced with more than a single exam, and challenged the joint entrance examination (JEE) established by the Indian Institute of Technology.

And this JeE is going to need a ticket, and you're going to have to be able to pass at least 20% of the 10 million candidates for the JeE in 2017, and the final number of those who qualify for the JeE examination is 1186,000, and how many people do Indian S.T.A.? 4000 No, no, no, no, no, no. The JeE examination is a three-hour written test, consisting of 90 objective questions, covering physics, chemistry, mathematics, and, on average, four minutes.

Starting with the first question, you are faced with no less difficult than the last three single questions in China’s competitive examination, but this is only a first test. After the first trial, because objective questions must have the right answers, this million candidate will rank according to merit, the first 20% will take the next round of final retesting, and the difficulty of retesting JeE is clearly not something I can imagine.

In India, more than 95% of students learn extracurricular guidance two to three years in advance, extracurricular learning about physico-chemistry, and Indian parents contributed $22.5 billion to extracurricular counselling in 2017. In the north of India, a city called Kota, the country’s best-known “remediate capital,” is home to more than 100 remedial institutions on 202 square kilometres of land, where teenage cadets are sent to classrooms filled with 1,200 people in Miami, where they receive more than 15 hours of intensive learning a day, and where the only way of survival is achievement.

But, at the same time, the problem is that, with the Indian word in place, it is now a luxury to be able to attend remedial classes. Because remedial institutions like Kota charge 3,000 dollars a year, so that Indians can control income only 2,000 dollars a year, so that they can study in Kota, mostly middle-income families in India.

What about the children of the poor in India? Then you'll have to urge your dad to work out more normally, because on the day of the exam, it's really hard for the rich and the middle class in India to describe the money in my plain language. Bihar is one of India's most backward regions, but in this one of India's most backward areas, news of the same year of the two-way banishment of the arts and science dollar, and in the 12th grade graduation examination, the 17-year-old Ruby-Ray took the lead, became the Bihar State's Renaissance, and the country's relatives listened to it. The answer was to be true.

The local examination board set her up on the spot, and she answered a zero-point call, and she was arrested immediately after. The news, naturally, provoked popular outrage, and the examination board thought that if it did not, the science certificate would also have to go down a few days later, because he said in the interview that the chemical pattern of water was not H2O. The two men also confessed, that the coin had been bought, and that the poor, who made up the vast majority, had only physical strength.

As early as 2015, this picture outside of Bihar’s classroom shocked the world, with students fighting on stressful and middle-test issues, and outside classroom walls, with Indian parents fighting on stress and middle-test issues, and poor people who cannot afford high-level cheating devices to help their children realize their dreams in the most simple way. Perhaps you are laughing, but these images, which we are laughing at, are a life of near despair for the poor in India.

In such a high-testing situation, Indian technology is not just a high salary and face, but a real “knowledge change of fate.” But now it seems that, after graduating from Indian science, they tend to look not to India, but to Europe and America, where the brain drain rate is as high as 80 per cent, especially in India’s superior computers and related professions.

India’s Minister of Education has also been troubled, and has repeatedly lamented: I want talent growth, not brain drain. Now there seems to be a group of people who are interested in India’s IT industry, but who, for decades, have suffered the consequences of wages, living conditions, and research conditions: nearly 600,000 of India’s top graduates have gone overseas for further studies; 4000 high-profile experts have emigrated to Europe and America.

In the US, a computer programmer has an average annual salary of $75,000; in India, a designer who does the same job has only $1.25 million a year, which is equivalent to only one-sixth of America’s salary. India’s constitution has long given “citizens the right to move and settle freely.”

In that year, former Indian Prime Minister Ra Gandhi, a well-known “computer prime minister”, said, “We did not lose an Indian scientist, engineer, or doctor, even when they were 50 or 60 years old. We see this brain drain as an "intellectual bank" that is saving interest and waiting for India to extract it.

Last year, in response to an open inquiry by members of Parliament, the Minister of Human Resources of India, Dr. Joshi, argued that the Government did not agree with the view expressed in the United Nations Talent Development Report that “India lost $2 billion a year because of brain drain” because, in the view of the Indian Government, when Indian talent returned from Europe and America, they brought not only money, but also visibility and innovation to India.

Why do you think Indians in America are better than Chinese? Indians are smart, usually scientists.